핀란드·노르웨이 leaders, Russian president discuss Ukraine war and possible Abu Dhabi talks
On October 27, Finnish President Alexander Stubb and Norwegian Prime Minister Jonas Gahr Støre held a 90-minute phone call with Russian President Vladimir Putin about the war in Ukraine and possible negotiations. Afterward, they told Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy that Russia appeared seriously prepared for a meeting of negotiating teams in Abu Dhabi, although the European Commission said it saw no particular readiness by Putin for peace negotiations.
핵심 요약
- Alexander Stubb and Jonas Gahr Støre initiated the call with Putin independently, representing Finland and Norway rather than the EU.
- Before the call, Stubb and Støre discussed with Zelenskyy the agenda for a possible Ukraine-US-Russia negotiating-team meeting in Abu Dhabi.
- The call lasted 90 minutes, compared with the planned 20 minutes.
- After the call, Stubb and Støre said Russia appeared seriously prepared for the Abu Dhabi meeting.
- Ukraine proposes discussing initial de-escalation steps in energy and at sea, a prisoner exchange and the possible format of a leaders-level trilateral meeting.
- Ukraine says security guarantees are a key issue; it also says Russia is seeking security guarantees for itself.
- The proposed trilateral meeting in Abu Dhabi depends on the US side, and Ukraine wants it to take place before a possible US-China-Russia meeting.
- Financial Times sources said Putin spent most of the call lecturing on history and that an immediate ceasefire was barely discussed.
왜 중요한가
The contact created an additional diplomatic channel between Putin and European leaders who support Ukraine. However, Putin's insistence on the alleged “root causes” of the war, recognition of “realities on the ground,” and reported unwillingness to compromise over Donbas suggested no major concessions on key Russian demands. The assessment by Stubb and Støre could therefore shape expectations for the planned Abu Dhabi meeting, although its occurrence depended on the US position. Ukraine has proposed an agenda focused on de-escalation, prisoner exchanges, security guarantees and the possible format of leaders-level talks.
무슨 일이 있었나
Finnish President Alexander Stubb and Norwegian Prime Minister Jonas Gahr Støre initiated a phone call with Vladimir Putin on October 27 after discussing the proposed Abu Dhabi agenda with Zelenskyy. They represented their own countries, not the EU as a whole, and the conversation continued discussions they had begun in Oslo on October 20. The call lasted 90 minutes, although only 20 minutes had been planned.
The leaders conveyed a coordinated position and discussed de-escalation measures in energy and maritime infrastructure, attacks on ships carrying Ukrainian grain, prisoner exchanges, security guarantees for Ukraine, and security in the Baltic Sea and Northern Europe. Putin, according to the synthesis, repeated his position that the war's alleged “root causes,” including NATO expansion, had to be addressed before peace negotiations. He also said a peace agreement had to reflect “realities on the ground,” which ISW interprets as a demand to recognize occupied Ukrainian territory as part of Russia. Reuters reported, citing a source close to the Kremlin, that Putin refused to compromise over Donbas. Financial Times sources said he spent much of the call lecturing on medieval history and that an immediate ceasefire was barely discussed.
Afterward, Stubb and Støre reported to Zelenskyy that Russia appeared seriously prepared for the planned negotiating-team meeting in Abu Dhabi. They also planned to brief European national-security advisers and other partners.
우크라이나 매체의 시각
Ukrainian coverage centered on coordination with Zelenskyy before the call, the content conveyed to him afterward and the implications for the Abu Dhabi negotiations. Ukraine's priorities are concrete de-escalation in energy and at sea, a prisoner exchange and return of captives, security guarantees, and preparations for a possible meeting of the countries' leaders. Kyiv treats territorial questions as a “red line” that should be addressed only by the leaders of the warring states at the appropriate level, rather than settled through preliminary talks or exchanged draft documents.
국제 매체의 시각
The international framing is more skeptical about the diplomatic significance of the call. The European Commission said it saw no particular readiness by Putin to participate in peace negotiations and had no additional information about possible European participation in Abu Dhabi. International assessments also emphasize Putin's maximalist demands, his reported unwillingness to compromise over Donbas and the unresolved question of Europe's role at the negotiating table. The reaction was mixed: Finland and Norway defended the initiative and their continued support for Ukraine, while Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen criticized the call and its lack of prior coordination with other European countries.
보도가 엇갈리는 지점
There are two clear differences in the available accounts. First, Stubb and Støre said Russia appeared seriously prepared for the Abu Dhabi meeting, whereas the European Commission said it saw no particular readiness by Putin for peace negotiations. Second, sources differ on who knew about the call in advance: some reports say Stubb and Støre warned Ukraine and the United States, while others say the European Commission knew beforehand but other European partners were not notified, prompting criticism.
배경
Trilateral Ukraine-US-Russia meetings had been paused since February of the previous year, with a resumption planned for the following month. Before contacting Putin, Stubb and Støre discussed the prospective Abu Dhabi agenda with Zelenskyy; their call also followed their October 20 meeting in Oslo. The United States had previously proposed demilitarized zones in Donbas and a demilitarized part of the Kinburn Spit, and Ukraine said it was prepared to consider such compromises at the appropriate level. A prior Brussels meeting involving Ukraine, the United States, EU leaders and the NATO secretary general was postponed because Washington was focused on the Middle East.